Back to Evidence
Paper-scoped peptide mentionSequence reported

GI

PMC12016742::PEP000002

Source publication

Off‐The‐Shelf Multivalent Nanoconjugate Cancer Vaccine Rescues Host Immune Response against Melanoma

Advanced Materials · 2025

Sequence status
reported
Standardization
Sequence ready
Source location
text
Activity records
39

Sequence evidence

Reported molecular identity

EGSRNQDWL

MHCI‐restricted gp100:25‐33 (EGSRNQDWL)

Resolved peptide links

Experimental observations

Records linked to this mention

AnticancerAntibacterialPositive observation
Record detail

this multivalent nanoconjugate induced potent antigen‐specific anti‐tumor immune responses compared to StCl‐GI (P = 0.0218), as shown by the frequency of splenic positive cells for tetramers that bind to T cell receptor‐specific for the gp100 peptide epitope (Figure 4h).

Measure
percent_inhibition
Value
P = 0.0218 vs StCl-GI
Target
Mus musculus
Assay
Not reported by source
Source publication
AnticancerGeneral ToxicPositive observation
Record detail

StCl‐GI_GII + αPD‐1 treatment supported animal survival up to forty‐five days post‐tumor inoculation, a value significantly higher compared to treatment with PBS or TAAs + αPD‐1 (P < 0.0001 in both cases) (Figure 5e).

Measure
survival_rate
Value
P < 0.0001 vs PBS and TAAs + αPD-1
Target
Mus musculus
Assay
Not reported by source
Source publication
AnticancerAntibacterialPositive observation
Record detail

Treatment with TAAs + αPD‐1 or StCl‐GI_GII + αPD‐1 significantly reduced tumor sizes when compared to PBS‐treated control mice at day twenty‐one (P = 0.0053 and P < 0.0001, respectively) (Figure 5b–d).

Measure
percent_inhibition
Value
P = 0.0053 vs PBS
Target
Mus musculus
Assay
Not reported by source
Source publication
AnticancerAntibacterialPositive observation
Record detail

Treatment with TAAs + αPD‐1 or StCl‐GI_GII + αPD‐1 significantly reduced tumor sizes when compared to PBS‐treated control mice at day twenty‐one (P = 0.0053 and P < 0.0001, respectively) (Figure 5b–d).

Measure
percent_inhibition
Value
P < 0.0001 vs PBS
Target
Mus musculus
Assay
Not reported by source
Source publication
AnticancerAntibacterialPositive observation
Record detail

At days fifteen and seventeen post‐treatment initiation, treatment with StCl‐GI_GII (P = 0.0037 and P < 0.0001) ... induced significantly reduced tumor growth compared to PBS (Figure 6c).

Measure
percent_inhibition
Value
P = 0.0037 vs PBS (day 15); P < 0.0001 vs PBS (day 17)
Target
Homo sapiens
Assay
Not reported by source
Source publication
AnticancerAntibacterialPositive observation
Record detail

At days fifteen and seventeen post‐treatment initiation, treatment with ... StCl‐GI_GII + αPD‐1 (P = 0.0156 and P < 0.0001) induced significantly reduced tumor growth compared to PBS (Figure 6c).

Measure
percent_inhibition
Value
P = 0.0156 vs PBS (day 15); P < 0.0001 vs PBS (day 17)
Target
Homo sapiens
Assay
Not reported by source
Source publication
AnticancerAntibacterialPositive observation
Record detail

At day 17 post‐treatment initiation, we observed a significant reduction in the individual tumor weight of mice treated with StCl‐GI_GII (P = 0.0086) or StCl‐GI_GII + αPD‐1 (P = 0.0092) (Figure S18d).

Measure
percent_inhibition
Value
P = 0.0086 vs PBS
Target
Homo sapiens
Assay
Not reported by source
Source publication
AnticancerAntibacterialPositive observation
Record detail

At day 17 post‐treatment initiation, we observed a significant reduction in the individual tumor weight of mice treated with StCl‐GI_GII (P = 0.0086) or StCl‐GI_GII + αPD‐1 (P = 0.0092) (Figure S18d).

Measure
percent_inhibition
Value
P = 0.0092 vs PBS
Target
Homo sapiens
Assay
Not reported by source
Source publication
ImmunomodulatoryAntibacterialPositive observation
Record detail

the monovalent as well as the multivalent nanoconjugates significantly induced CD3+ T cell infiltration (P < 0.0001) within tumors compared to controls (Figure 4d).

Measure
percent_inhibition
Value
P < 0.0001 vs controls
Target
Mus musculus
Assay
Not reported by source
Source publication
ImmunomodulatoryAntibacterialPositive observation
Record detail

the enhanced frequency of splenic CD4+ (P < 0.0001), CD8+ (P < 0.0001), and CD8+ IL2+ T cells (P < 0.0249), and CD8+/Treg ratio (P < 0.0001) (Figure S14d–g) compared to the other treated groups.

Measure
percent_inhibition
Value
P < 0.0001 vs other groups
Target
Mus musculus
Assay
Not reported by source
Source publication
ImmunomodulatoryAntibacterialPositive observation
Record detail

the enhanced frequency of splenic CD4+ (P < 0.0001), CD8+ (P < 0.0001), and CD8+ IL2+ T cells (P < 0.0249), and CD8+/Treg ratio (P < 0.0001) (Figure S14d–g) compared to the other treated groups.

Measure
percent_inhibition
Value
P < 0.0249 vs other groups
Target
Mus musculus
Assay
Not reported by source
Source publication
ImmunomodulatoryAntibacterialPositive observation
Record detail

PD‐1 expression by CD8+ T cells became significantly reduced in animals treated with StCl‐GI_GII + αPD‐1 compared to TAAs + αPD‐1 (P = 0.0006) or PBS (P = 0.0002) (Figure 5j).

Measure
percent_inhibition
Value
P = 0.0006 vs TAAs + αPD-1; P = 0.0002 vs PBS
Target
Mus musculus
Assay
Not reported by source
Source publication
ImmunomodulatoryAntibacterialPositive observation
Record detail

number of anti‐tumor/pro‐inflammatory tumor‐associated macrophages (TAMs) (P = 0.0404) (Figure 5i) within the TME of mice treated with StCl‐GI_GII + αPD‐1 compared to mice treated with PBS or TAAs + αPD‐1.

Measure
percent_inhibition
Value
P = 0.0404 vs PBS and TAAs + αPD-1
Target
Mus musculus
Assay
Not reported by source
Source publication
ImmunomodulatoryAntibacterialPositive observation
Record detail

we observed a higher percentage of human CD3+ T cells (P = 0.0232) in the TME of animals treated with StCl‐GI_GII + αPD‐1 compared to StCl‐GI_GII (P = 0.0232) (Figure 6d).

Measure
percent_inhibition
Value
P = 0.0232 vs StCl-GI_GII
Target
Homo sapiens
Assay
Not reported by source
Source publication
ImmunomodulatoryAntibacterialPositive observation
Record detail

a higher number of human CD8+ T cells in the spleen following treatment with StCl‐GI_GII + αPD‐1 compared to StCl‐GI_GII (P = 0.0023) and PBS (P = 0.0001) (Figure 6e).

Measure
percent_inhibition
Value
P = 0.0023 vs StCl-GI_GII; P = 0.0001 vs PBS
Target
Homo sapiens
Assay
Not reported by source
Source publication
ImmunomodulatoryAntibacterialPositive observation
Record detail

we did observe a significant reduction in PD‐1‐expressing CD3+ (P = 0.0160), and CD8+ T cells (P = 0.0018) in the spleen of animals treated with StCl‐GI_GII + αPD‐1 compared to StCl‐GI_GII and PBS (P = 0.0027 and P < 0.0001, respectively) (Figure 6g,h).

Measure
percent_inhibition
Value
P = 0.0160 vs StCl-GI_GII; P = 0.0027 vs PBS
Target
Homo sapiens
Assay
Not reported by source
Source publication
ImmunomodulatoryAntibacterialPositive observation
Record detail

we did observe a significant reduction in PD‐1‐expressing CD3+ (P = 0.0160), and CD8+ T cells (P = 0.0018) in the spleen of animals treated with StCl‐GI_GII + αPD‐1 compared to StCl‐GI_GII and PBS (P = 0.0027 and P < 0.0001, respectively) (Figure 6g,h).

Measure
percent_inhibition
Value
P = 0.0018 vs StCl-GI_GII; P < 0.0001 vs PBS
Target
Homo sapiens
Assay
Not reported by source
Source publication
ImmunomodulatoryAntibacterialPositive observation
Record detail

We observed the increased infiltration of CD3+ (P = 0.0378), CD4+ (P = 0.0206), and CD8+ (P = 0.0293) T cells into tumors of animals treated with StCl‐GI_GII + αPD‐1 (Figure 6i–k,n).

Measure
percent_inhibition
Value
P = 0.0378 vs PBS
Target
Homo sapiens
Assay
Not reported by source
Source publication
ImmunomodulatoryAntibacterialPositive observation
Record detail

We observed the increased infiltration of CD3+ (P = 0.0378), CD4+ (P = 0.0206), and CD8+ (P = 0.0293) T cells into tumors of animals treated with StCl‐GI_GII + αPD‐1 (Figure 6i–k,n).

Measure
percent_inhibition
Value
P = 0.0206 vs PBS
Target
Homo sapiens
Assay
Not reported by source
Source publication
ImmunomodulatoryAntibacterialPositive observation
Record detail

We observed the increased infiltration of CD3+ (P = 0.0378), CD4+ (P = 0.0206), and CD8+ (P = 0.0293) T cells into tumors of animals treated with StCl‐GI_GII + αPD‐1 (Figure 6i–k,n).

Measure
percent_inhibition
Value
P = 0.0293 vs PBS
Target
Homo sapiens
Assay
Not reported by source
Source publication
ImmunomodulatoryAntibacterialPositive observation
Record detail

significantly increased Caspase‐3 expression compared to PBS‐treated animals (P < 0.0001) (Figure 6l–n).

Measure
percent_inhibition
Value
P < 0.0001 vs PBS
Target
Homo sapiens
Assay
Not reported by source
Source publication
ImmunomodulatoryAntibacterialPositive observation
Record detail

CD4+ T cell (P = 0.0002) (Figure 6j) and Caspase‐3 (P < 0.0001) (Figure 6l) levels induced by this combination immunotherapy were significantly higher than the ones quantified in the tumor of animals treated only with the multivalent conjugate.

Measure
percent_inhibition
Value
P = 0.0002 vs StCl-GI_GII
Target
Homo sapiens
Assay
Not reported by source
Source publication
ImmunomodulatoryAntibacterialPositive observation
Record detail

CD4+ T cell (P = 0.0002) (Figure 6j) and Caspase‐3 (P < 0.0001) (Figure 6l) levels induced by this combination immunotherapy were significantly higher than the ones quantified in the tumor of animals treated only with the multivalent conjugate.

Measure
percent_inhibition
Value
P < 0.0001 vs StCl-GI_GII
Target
Homo sapiens
Assay
Not reported by source
Source publication
ImmunomodulatoryAntibacterialPositive observation
Record detail

we observed a significant decrease in Ki67 tumor expression for StCl‐GI_GII compared to the PBS group (P = 0.0134) (Figure 6m,n).

Measure
percent_inhibition
Value
P = 0.0134 vs PBS
Target
Homo sapiens
Assay
Not reported by source
Source publication
ToxicityGeneral ToxicPositive observation
Record detail

LDH levels increased in GI+GII+TLRl–treated mice due to antigen‐associated toxicity and significantly decreased in StCl‐GI_GII‐treated mice (P = 0.0105) (Figure S13c).

Measure
percent_inhibition
Value
P = 0.0105 vs GI+GII+TLRl
Target
Mus musculus
Assay
Not reported by source
Source publication
ToxicityGeneral ToxicPositive observation
Record detail

a decrease in AST after treatment with StCl‐GI_GII (P = 0.0848) and GI+GII+TLRl (P = 0.0001) (Figure S13c).

Measure
percent_inhibition
Value
P = 0.0848 vs PBS
Target
Mus musculus
Assay
Not reported by source
Source publication
ToxicityGeneral ToxicPositive observation
Record detail

a decrease in AST after treatment with StCl‐GI_GII (P = 0.0848) and GI+GII+TLRl (P = 0.0001) (Figure S13c).

Measure
percent_inhibition
Value
P = 0.0001 vs PBS
Target
Mus musculus
Assay
Not reported by source
Source publication
ImmunomodulatoryAntibacterialPositive observation
Record detail

we found reduced PD‐L1 expression by BECs following the administration of each nanoconjugate, with StCl‐GI + StCl‐GII‐treated mice displaying the lowest value (P = 0.0355) (Figure S15d).

Measure
percent_inhibition
Value
P = 0.0355 vs PBS
Target
Mus musculus
Assay
Not reported by source
Source publication
ImmunomodulatoryAntibacterialPositive observation
Record detail

Tumors from StCl‐GI + StCl‐GII‐treated mice also displayed increased levels of IFN‐γ expressing BECs (P = 0.0122) (Figure S15e) and LECs (P = 0.0027) (Figure S15f) compared to animals treated with GI +GII in solution.

Measure
percent_inhibition
Value
P = 0.0122 vs GI+GII
Target
Mus musculus
Assay
Not reported by source
Source publication
ImmunomodulatoryAntibacterialPositive observation
Record detail

Tumors from StCl‐GI + StCl‐GII‐treated mice also displayed increased levels of IFN‐γ expressing BECs (P = 0.0122) (Figure S15e) and LECs (P = 0.0027) (Figure S15f) compared to animals treated with GI +GII in solution.

Measure
percent_inhibition
Value
P = 0.0027 vs GI+GII
Target
Mus musculus
Assay
Not reported by source
Source publication
ImmunomodulatoryAntibacterialPositive observation
Record detail

StCl‐GI_GII treatment increased the percentage of MHCI‐expressing LECs (P < 0.0001) while decreasing the percentage of MHCII‐ (P = 0.0236) and PD‐L1‐expressing LECs (P < 0.0001) (Figure S16a–d,h) in tumor‐draining lymph nodes when compared to the same tissues in untreated mice.

Measure
percent_inhibition
Value
P < 0.0001 vs untreated
Target
Mus musculus
Assay
Not reported by source
Source publication
ImmunomodulatoryAntibacterialPositive observation
Record detail

StCl‐GI_GII treatment increased the percentage of MHCI‐expressing LECs (P < 0.0001) while decreasing the percentage of MHCII‐ (P = 0.0236) and PD‐L1‐expressing LECs (P < 0.0001) (Figure S16a–d,h) in tumor‐draining lymph nodes when compared to the same tissues in untreated mice.

Measure
percent_inhibition
Value
P = 0.0236 vs untreated
Target
Mus musculus
Assay
Not reported by source
Source publication
ImmunomodulatoryAntibacterialPositive observation
Record detail

B16F10 melanoma‐bearing mice treated with TAAs + αPD‐1 and StCl‐GI_GII + αPD‐1 presented with tumors displaying a significantly reduced frequency of BECs (P = 0.0315 and P = 0.0469, respectively) (Figure 5m).

Measure
percent_inhibition
Value
P = 0.0315 vs PBS
Target
Mus musculus
Assay
Not reported by source
Source publication
ImmunomodulatoryAntibacterialPositive observation
Record detail

B16F10 melanoma‐bearing mice treated with TAAs + αPD‐1 and StCl‐GI_GII + αPD‐1 presented with tumors displaying a significantly reduced frequency of BECs (P = 0.0315 and P = 0.0469, respectively) (Figure 5m).

Measure
percent_inhibition
Value
P = 0.0469 vs PBS
Target
Mus musculus
Assay
Not reported by source
Source publication
ImmunomodulatoryAntibacterialPositive observation
Record detail

only mice treated with TAAs + αPD‐1 presented with a significantly increased percentage of LECs (P = 0.0417) (Figure 5n) when compared to PBS.

Measure
percent_inhibition
Value
P = 0.0417 vs PBS
Target
Mus musculus
Assay
Not reported by source
Source publication
ImmunomodulatoryAntibacterialPositive observation
Record detail

Ki67 analysis demonstrated the near absence of proliferation following treatment with TAAs + αPD‐1 (P = 0.0077) and StCl‐GI_GII + αPD‐1 (P = 0.0085) (Figure 5r).

Measure
percent_inhibition
Value
P = 0.0077 vs PBS
Target
Mus musculus
Assay
Not reported by source
Source publication
ImmunomodulatoryAntibacterialPositive observation
Record detail

Ki67 analysis demonstrated the near absence of proliferation following treatment with TAAs + αPD‐1 (P = 0.0077) and StCl‐GI_GII + αPD‐1 (P = 0.0085) (Figure 5r).

Measure
percent_inhibition
Value
P = 0.0085 vs PBS
Target
Mus musculus
Assay
Not reported by source
Source publication

Local peptide labels such as P1, PEP1, or peptide 1 are grouped only within this paper and are not assumed to represent the same molecule across publications.